niplav @niplav@schelling.pt

There's also the thing that many people don't know how to hold frames well, so that people can take them out of their hands and put new ones in in a couple of seconds

*points* here's a huge Hansonian mess
And evertime this happens (it happens all the time), we can ostraisize one person who is involved

It's kind of worrying how agitated this makes me. I guess I have my little communities I want to *protect*, by keeping them small & original. And I'm conflating several things: legitimacy and simulacrum levels and getting-shit-done-ness and cohesion and…

But that tweet evoked in me a strong sensation of *disgust*, that if the hot women join it will all be about intrasexual competition *again*, and if you're doing something important, your goal is to become legitimate. I don't like this at all.

because that's exactly also the moment the psychopaths start joining: https://meaningness.com/geeks-mops-sociopaths

and it's also the moment you shed the last bit of simulacrum 1 you had: https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/simulacrum-levels

Context: https://twitter.com/visakanv/status/1464208862328725510

IF YOU ARE ILLEGITIMATE, STAY ILLEGITIMATE

BECOME ILLEGITIMATE

Let us a lettuce lattice

Posit a poset...

I like the polytope discourse

Advent calendar, but every door contains an alignment paper

Today im reading "Agent Foundations for Aligning Machine Intelligence with Human Interests: A Technical Research Agenda"

Rejecting the Axiom of Foundation is lindy