Show newer

This would also explain why for many people the main source of meaning in their lives is their job: it's the only place they create.

Show thread

Claim: It's well-known that in terms of long-term satisfaction, buying experiences>buying things, but probably the real hierarchy is making things≫buying experiences>buying things.

How about we bring back "methinks" instead of "imho"?

niplav boosted

They follow this up with another proposal, "move to hollywood and do fraud"

Show thread

Asymmetric info has biggest relevance in one-shot high-cost purchases.

Jobs are not in that category very much: repeated medium-value transactions with high info content early on.

But one can make asymmetric info more important, e.g. by making it harder to quit/fire quickly.

Also the reason for focus on used cars as examples in asymmetric info teaching

Sila can just be to work on an assignment first thing in the morning, before meditation

niplav boosted

What competition? THERE IS NO COMPETITION ON A SERIOUS LEVEL

I have probably done daygame sessions where I've asked out more women than most men have in their entire lives 🤐

Show thread

Also Debate or alignment via market making is a infohazard gain-of-function lab

Additional problem with alignment via debate: Löbian circuits discoverable via mutual introspection, allow for deceptive cooperation

Wandering around on holiday today and feeling the daygame itch

In Edinburgh atm if any mutuals want to meet

Meditation has (unlike most other things) increasing marginal returns

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one