Show newer

More Quote Toot Discussion 

With Gargron now considering developing QTs, we should talk specifics:

It may sound good to have an option to disable QTs, and I don't oppose it. However, I fear people don't understand that disabling it actually makes you more vulnerable, not less.

QTs track everyone who is QTing you. This gives you situational awareness, and the ability to block bad actors. If you disable QTs, people may resort to screenshotting and linking instead, which you have no oversight of.

@dpiepgrass yeah all this stuff is very much a matter of opinion; some tribes on here skew very conservative with CWs; it very much depends on who your audience is and what your attitude is towards potential upset. my policy on this instance is that CWs are never required besides for explicit content, users are encouraged t decide their own CW policies. other instances can do as they like towards us as a consequence

@delca he's like, the most boring kind of right. yeah, that analogy works. but as you said, there's no real path to a universal ban

@empathy2000 I'm working on a set of principles but in short, yeah! it should only be a last resort, and the most I've done so far is exclude porn instances from showing up on the federated TL, but yall still free to follow those if so inclined

@empathy2000 you figure out what it is you actually want; if it's social validation, you decide to be okay with explicitly going for that instead of getting it thru proxies. if smth else, no amount of social validation will fit that need

@cosmiccitizen I see the logic, but this isn't true in my experience; I regularly both see others organizing meatspace phenomena and also do so myself

Useful test: don't join a Mastodon instance that doesn't let you follow raspberrypi.social/@Raspberry_ - defederated by many instances because they hired a policeman who had used a Pi to do police work in the past, and were then unapologetic about it.

techdirt.com/2022/12/12/raspbe

@dpiepgrass unfortunately so, yeah. QTs are a major area of controversy amongst Masto users. we may be able to change this eventually by switching to a different frontend, but for now it is what it is

and for crossposting, check out the announcements! the little megaphone icon on the top of home timeline, if you're on web

twitter xp 

I've found much utility in the litany of gendlin reframing: I've been wrong the whole time, but admitting it gives me a chance to become right

---
RT @pee_zombie
this is precisely my attitude towards software bugs, and why I make a point of being HAPPY and excited to find them; they were already there, but now that you've become aware, they can be fixed! I find this a powerful mindset shift to teach to neophyte engineers https://twitte…
twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/

Show thread

twitter xp 

if only epistemics were immune to the fallacy of the excluded middle

all too often there's a massive chasm of confusion to be crossed between realizing you're wrong and finding what's right

this is why we're so loathe to admit this, bc then we risk having to wander
---
RT @staringispolite
an underrated thing about admitting you were wrong is you immediately become right
twitter.com/staringispolite/st

@easoncxz great idea but all my hooks are already occupied; altho could be a great incentive to minimize the reuse queue...

twitter xp 

is it that Proper Adults don't seem to have this problem? and, perhaps this is true, as I don't recall my parents having a Chair; why is this so? do they truly not re-wear clothing? or do they put it back in their closet and don't differentiate between unworn and worn but clean?

Show thread

twitter xp 

I've recently taken to using a dedicated shelf just for this purpose and it's been Quite Nice; instead of pretending this need doesn't exist I explicitly acknowledge it and designate a staging area

why are we generally so unwilling to do this? so many people have The Chair

Show thread

twitter xp 

all too real and speaks to an unsolved problem in the wardrobe design space; how was this addressed in the past when laundry was a much bigger deal? how did handmaids handle this for their clients?
---
RT @0xAsync
No mom it's not a "messy pile of clothes on my chair" it's an L1 cache for fast random access to my frequently used clothes in O(1) time. It needs to be big to avoid expensive cache misses (looking in my closet). I NEED to be min…
twitter.com/0xAsync/status/160

@Ben_Reinhardt
not that I know of, unfortunately; I think there may be a masto fork out there that does this but it's p controversial

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one