@alexthecamel I still find it funny that the academic name is "idiosyncracy credits"[1]. Increasingly verbose meme.
@vriska Number of pillows on your bed
@vriska Number of blankets on your bed
@panchromaticity ^^^^^^^ this
@aquarial Nice, thank you! Cool window
@TetraspaceGrouping @noop_noob bad takes beget bad takes
@adamconover
Those two things might look very similar: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/LpM3EAakwYdS6aRKf/what-multipolar-failure-looks-like-and-robust-agent-agnostic#Part_1__Slow_stories__and_lessons_therefrom
AI, AIPOL
Even as dumb as they are, current LLMs do have some extremely limited emergent general intelligence capabilities.
The comparison to parrots is apt, because parrots are (generally) intelligent too. Don't knock parrots just because they aren't humans (and the parrots are currently smarter than our best AIs).
We also (as far as I'm aware) haven't found the limits of current approaches. We really don't know what's going to happen.
@p No worries! Nitpicking is good™.
@p I don't know how to answer "finding local optima for problems like how to get food". My question was underspecified but that's okay it's only a fediverse poll.
@p Or in creating rocket propulsion systems, how much more efficient can the optimum be?
@p All of humanity. E.g. in creating superconductors at atmospheric pressure, what's the highest temperature that they can exist at?
@typeswitch the segfaults in our char stars
@Erik *👀*
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].