@pee_zombie lol same for me
@eiaine Glorious :D
Similar to the problem of people speaking to each other in person without corporate fact checkers involved.
---
RT @NiemanLab
Clubhouse poses major challenges for fact-checkers since it doesn't keep old posts, audio files, or allow users to record conversations. https://nie.mn/3aOeUni
https://twitter.com/NiemanLab/status/1359934480417501185
@cn All that said, if I'm writing a service, I'm reaching for Go more often than not. I moved to OCaml over the last two years for PL R&D and day to day Swiss Army knife stuff, which has been rewarding, but I've found it inferior to Go for a range of different tasks.
@cn speaking as user since 1.0:
- core team is increasingly high-handed and dismissive (most of the other issues stem from this)
- grafting RubyGems on top of the package system was a bad idea
- there is a dangerous crop of unfixed compiler bugs nobody plans on fixing
- the idiomatic way to do things like variants is incredibly kludgy
- channels are a huge footgun for new people and the tooling around them is still primitive
@ken RETVRN
@eiaine what kind of miner are you running?
@fluffy RIP
Turns out you can't fake aggregation effects and as long as a critical mass of people are addicted to Twitter not much is gonna change
bullshit that they didnt use corona-chan
nitter.net/SCMPNews/status/1352885026065539072#m
@WomanCorn
We probably shouldn't elect a king every four years. Directory government makes a lot more sense. Enforced collegiality works well in Switzerland.
Currently making machines that make other machines (Utility). Formerly writing programs that run other programs (Ohlogen). Also tribune of the plebs (The Neoliberal Project).
Cryptoanarchotechnocrat with Helvetic-Temasekan characteristics.