Show newer

RT @WeftOfSoul
@whomademecrispy a stabbing is a penetration; consuming something is taking a part of a body inside yours; death and virginity are boundaries you irreversibly cross; there's a thrill in being desired carnally, one's body being used mercilessly

RT @WeftOfSoul
@whomademecrispy there's an erotic appeal in vore and guro: big emotions adjacent to lust and satisfaction and seduction and chase; insides being visible; visceral and bodily in an undeniable way; animal instinct; surrender and sacrifice, offering oneself up for the pleasure of others; corruption

pet peeve: how "X should Y" can mean both "I believe that X does Y" and "I want X to do Y". I always reflexively switch to "ought to" before remembering it has the same exact problem

people lean pretty hard on the "yeah well that doesn't technically violate the first amendment" retort huh

something being legal doesn't make it wise or right

it's incredible how much google trending searches tells us about humanity

oh god oh no there's a Moomin merch shop my wallet is not safe

forbidden knowledge #512: advanced frog stacking techniques

what shows are y'all currently watching ? 📺

all-natural hormone-free grass-fed free-range big mommy milkers

testing moa.party crossposting please ignore ┐(︶▽︶)┌

people who drink non-alcoholic hopped drinks are not to be trusted

@urshanabi corollary: when people insist that your posts are a representative sample of your views as a whole. weirdly enough they mostly only take issue with this when I talk about an aspect of a political issue they think isn't as important as other aspects, and they declare that I only care about that aspect.

thing is, my posts as a whole are like 99% shitposts about catboys, but they never take this to mean I only care about catboys. it annoys me when people selectively apply their logic.

on mastodon, shouldn't the terms of service be called the "consti-toot-ion"?

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one