this also concerns the Parler/AWS saga. the hypermodernist dream of an infinitely scalable cloud is contingent on political alignment; an invisible constraint, keenly felt by those outside the lines
the future is already here, just unevenly distributed
https://thenewstack.io/why-parler-cant-rebuild-a-scalable-cloud-service-from-scratch/
---
RT @pee_zombie
from a state-actor perspective private blue-teamers are arms dealers, public re…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1351778921352728576
with the mainstream able to obtain timeshares to Amazon's massive datacenters, we become easily deluded into mistaking this access for a universal utility
the unassuming term "vendor lock-in" obscures the nature of the relevant power relations, & who owns the means of production
"According to Hootsuite, the number of Global Internet users has already reached almost 4.66 billion, or about 53% of the global population."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Internet_usage
IMHO means global democracy over the internet is already tractable and defensible.
It's nice to see Mastodon is really able to replicate all of Twitter's "features".
https://explosion.party/objects/a7783a74-62c0-47e2-9d69-8ceceda48a56
Oh no no no how did I get here?!?
scaling up communication channels without scaling up empathy & human decency = our current state