niplav @niplav@schelling.pt

tbh whenever someone is like “the existing arguments for agi xrisk were insufficient/unclear, here's my better version” the arguments read exactly the same to me as the existing ones.

@TetraspaceGrouping no

@sj
we prefer the word "phyg", but it's functionally the same: you wouldn't believe the amount of blood I've sacrificed to get that account[1]!

[1]: https://www.lesswrong.com/users/niplav
[2]: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hxGEKxaHZEKT4fpms/our-phyg-is-not-exclusive-enough

@panchromaticity i think this one needs explaining (at least for me)

@Yujiri

that was always an extremely mid meme

i mean sorry guys make up some better archetypes

@Elucidating

no worries :-)

@Elucidating
I also have to resist the social pressure to read HPMOR

also fair enough, everyone is (luckily) (still?) free to choose the people they interact with

do you want me to unfollow you/not respond to your posts?

Am I "openly and credulously pushing lesswrong and SSC"?

@Elucidating
am i being subtooted?

(if so, uh, fair enough)

(though it *is* possible to mute specific words, which I consider a superior method of filtering)

*entering /r/ssc*
"you think *that's* a good criticism of decision markets‽ THIS is a good criticism of decision markets"

@delca

i like the wikipedia list of eponymous laws a lot

so far on the tl i see fox, cat, bird, other bird, cyber woman, fish and owl

æsop would have a field day

@andrew @pee_zombie

heyho

i lived here when all had left, during the time the server died

@rip_imho :]

it's igneous

Another scheduled reminder that every tweet in your timeline is actually me posting from one of my accounts. Don't believe me? Watch me post this from my other account.

@andrew
sounds like a plan!

To be fair, the FAQ doesn't even contain the words "self-fulfilling prediction", and doesn't talk about the dangers that happen when you plug a thing that can take actions (government) into a powerful optimizer (the market), so I'm not 100% sold on it either